Home
risks-and-benefits-of-energy-performance-contracting

Risks and Benefits of Energy Performance Contracting

Energy Performance Contracting (EPC) has become a widely adopted model for implementing energy efficiency projects, allowing organizations to improve their energy performance without incurring significant upfront capital expenditures. Instead, financing is provided through the future savings generated by energy-efficient upgrades. While EPC offers numerous advantages, it also carries certain risks. Understanding these risks and benefits is essential for both building owners and Energy Service Companies (ESCOs) involved in such agreements.

In this article, we will examine both the risks and benefits of EPC, providing a balanced view of this energy-saving financing model.

Benefits of Energy Performance Contracting

EPC offers numerous advantages to both building owners and ESCOs, making it an attractive option for energy efficiency improvements. These benefits range from financial flexibility to long-term energy savings and sustainability goals.

1. No Upfront Capital Investment

One of the most compelling benefits of EPC is that it allows organizations to implement energy-saving measures without the need for significant upfront capital. This is particularly valuable for organizations with limited access to funding or for those that wish to allocate capital elsewhere. The cost of the energy-efficient upgrades is repaid over time from the energy savings generated by the improvements.

2. Guaranteed Energy Savings

A hallmark of EPC is the performance guarantee provided by the ESCO. This guarantee ensures that the energy savings achieved from the implemented measures will meet or exceed the projected levels. If the savings fall short, the ESCO typically compensates the building owner for the difference, mitigating financial risk.

3. Improved Cash Flow and Reduced Operating Costs

The energy savings generated by the EPC project are used to finance the cost of the improvements. Over time, these savings often exceed the cost of repayment, resulting in net financial benefits. This leads to a reduction in overall operating costs for the building owner.

4. Long-Term Energy Savings

EPC typically focuses on achieving long-term energy savings through the implementation of high-performance, energy-efficient solutions. By reducing energy consumption and increasing efficiency, organizations can lower their energy bills for many years to come.

5. Environmental Benefits and Sustainability

Implementing energy-efficient measures through EPC can significantly reduce a building’s environmental footprint. This is particularly beneficial for organizations aiming to meet sustainability targets or comply with regulatory environmental standards.

6. Increased Property Value

Energy-efficient buildings are more attractive to tenants, investors, and potential buyers. By improving energy performance, EPC can increase the value of a property, making it a more competitive asset in the real estate market.


Risks of Energy Performance Contracting

While EPC offers many advantages, it is not without its risks. Both building owners and ESCOs must carefully consider these risks before entering into an EPC agreement.

1. Overestimated Energy Savings

One of the primary risks of EPC is the potential for overestimated energy savings. If the energy-saving measures do not deliver the expected results, the financial structure of the EPC agreement may not hold up, and the building owner could face higher-than-expected operating costs.

2. Long-Term Contractual Obligations

EPC contracts typically span a period of 5 to 20 years. This long-term commitment can pose risks for building owners who may face changes in their operational needs, building usage, or ownership during this time.

3. Complexity of M&V (Monitoring and Verification)

Accurate M&V is essential for determining the success of an EPC project. However, monitoring and verifying energy savings can be complex, especially if external factors (such as weather conditions or operational changes) impact energy use. Inaccurate M&V can lead to disputes and complications in repayment.

4. Unforeseen Operational or Structural Changes

Changes in the building’s operational conditions, such as a shift in occupancy or usage patterns, can impact energy consumption. These changes may lead to discrepancies between projected savings and actual performance, complicating the energy savings verification process.

5. Difficulty in Financing Large Projects

For larger projects, financing the upfront costs of energy-efficient upgrades can be challenging, especially if external financing is required. If financing cannot be secured or if interest rates rise, it could impact the feasibility of the EPC project.

6. Performance Risks

The success of an EPC project is dependent on the performance of the installed energy-efficient systems. If these systems fail to operate as expected, the building owner may not experience the anticipated energy savings, leading to dissatisfaction and possible contract disputes.


Conclusion

Energy Performance Contracting (EPC) offers significant benefits, including reduced capital investment, guaranteed energy savings, and long-term cost reductions, making it an attractive option for organizations seeking to improve energy efficiency. However, EPC also carries risks, such as the potential for overestimated savings, long-term contractual commitments, and the complexity of monitoring and verifying energy performance.

Both building owners and ESCOs must carefully weigh these risks and benefits before entering into an EPC agreement. By selecting the right energy-saving measures, ensuring accurate M&V, and structuring the contract to address potential risks, both parties can maximize the advantages of EPC while minimizing financial and operational risks.

DRIVING INNOVATION, DELIVERING EXCELLENCE