Home
standards-for-failure-impact-analysis-in-equipment

Standards for Failure Impact Analysis in Equipment

Standards for Failure Impact Analysis in Equipment: A Comprehensive Guide

Failure impact analysis (FIA) is a critical aspect of equipment maintenance and reliability engineering. It involves assessing the consequences of potential failures in equipment to identify areas that require improvement or optimization. The goal of FIA is to minimize the risk of equipment failure, reduce downtime, and ensure overall safety.

Standards for Failure Impact Analysis

Several standards and guidelines are available to support FIA, including:

  • API (American Petroleum Institute) Standard 579: Steel Storage Tanks for the Petroleum Industry

  • ASME (American Society of Mechanical Engineers) Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code

  • NFPA (National Fire Protection Association) 70B: Electrical Equipment in Commercial Occupancies

  • IEC (International Electrotechnical Commission) 61508: Functional Safety of Electrical/Electronic/Programmable Electronic Control Systems


  • These standards provide a framework for conducting FIA, including the identification of potential failure modes, estimation of their likelihood and impact, and development of mitigation strategies.

    Key Elements of Failure Impact Analysis

    Some key elements to consider when performing FIA include:

  • Failure Modes: Identify potential failure modes that could result in equipment downtime or damage.

  • Mechanical failures (e.g., bearing wear, gear tooth breakage)
    Electrical failures (e.g., short circuits, blown fuses)
    Human error
    Environmental factors (e.g., temperature, humidity)
  • Consequence Analysis: Assess the potential consequences of each failure mode, including:

  • Equipment damage or loss
    Downtime and lost production
    Safety risks to personnel
    Regulatory compliance issues

    Case Study: Failure Impact Analysis for a Chemical Processing Plant

    A chemical processing plant experienced repeated failures in its main pump, resulting in significant downtime and costs. To address this issue, the maintenance team conducted an FIA on the pump.

    Failure Modes and Consequences:

  • Mechanical failure (1):

  • Potential causes: Misalignment, imbalance, or worn-out bearings
    Potential consequences:
    - Equipment damage: 10,000
    - Downtime: 2 days
    - Safety risks: None
    - Regulatory compliance issues: None
  • Electrical failure (1):

  • Potential causes: Electrical overload or short circuit
    Potential consequences:
    - Equipment damage: 5,000
    - Downtime: 1 day
    - Safety risks: High (electrical shock)
    - Regulatory compliance issues: Moderate

    Recommendations and Implementation

    Based on the FIA results, the maintenance team recommended:

  • Regular alignment checks to prevent mechanical failure

  • Improved electrical monitoring and protection systems to prevent electrical failures

  • Training for maintenance personnel to ensure correct operation and troubleshooting procedures


  • Implementation of these recommendations resulted in a significant reduction in downtime and costs.

    QA Section: Additional Details on Failure Impact Analysis

    1. What is the primary goal of Failure Impact Analysis?
    The primary goal of FIA is to identify potential failure modes, estimate their likelihood and impact, and develop mitigation strategies to minimize risk and ensure equipment reliability.
    2. How do I determine the likelihood and impact of each failure mode?
    Use a combination of historical data, expert judgment, and analytical techniques (e.g., fault tree analysis) to estimate the likelihood and impact of each failure mode.
    3. What are some common tools used in Failure Impact Analysis?
    Common tools include:

    Fault tree analysis

    Event tree analysis

    Hazard and operability studies (HAZOP)

    Failure modes and effects analysis (FMEA)
    4. How do I involve stakeholders in the Failure Impact Analysis process?
    Involve maintenance personnel, operators, engineers, and other relevant stakeholders to ensure that all potential failure modes are identified and addressed.
    5. What are some common pitfalls to avoid when performing Failure Impact Analysis?
    Avoid:

    Overlooking rare but critical failure modes

    Underestimating the impact of potential failures

    Failing to consider human error or environmental factors
    6. How do I prioritize recommendations from the Failure Impact Analysis?
    Prioritize based on:
    Likelihood and severity of each failure mode
    Potential business impacts (e.g., downtime, cost savings)
    Regulatory compliance requirements
    7. Can Failure Impact Analysis be used for new equipment design?
    Yes! FIA can be applied to new equipment design to identify potential failure modes and improve overall reliability and safety.
    8. How do I ensure that the recommendations from the Failure Impact Analysis are implemented effectively?
    Establish a clear plan of action, assign responsibilities, set deadlines, and monitor progress to ensure successful implementation.

    In conclusion, FIA is a critical aspect of equipment maintenance and reliability engineering. By following established standards and guidelines, conducting thorough analysis, and involving relevant stakeholders, organizations can identify potential failure modes, minimize risk, and ensure overall safety.

    DRIVING INNOVATION, DELIVERING EXCELLENCE